I saw it before I bought it, but still.. kinda misleading, no? When the product is reasonably expected to be 1 portion worth of food, the printed calories of the serving size should be for the whole thing. No ones shaving off 4g from this snack bar.
Seriously.
by sw4ffles
8 Comments
Yes its misleading of them but that whole bar is only 120 calories? Maybe im wrong but thats super low for what you get
Everything so the <100kcal snack people are still getting your product.
you know what pissed me off along the same lines, gourmet cookies.
Something like Crumbl advertises a cookie at 200 cal per serving, you think well that’s a bigger cookie so that at lease 2 servings right? wrong…it’s 4 servings.
Let a friend have a bite.
Evil bastards. High sugar/calorie foods should just exist silently and humbly. Don’t try to be something you’re not. I remember the old Snickers commercials advertising the candy bar as a wholesome, in-between meal hunger zapper. Because peanuts.
Ok ignoring that, let’s get to the important part. Is that butterscotch? I’ve never seen that before! I need it
I’m so sorry, is this a butterscotch flavored chocolate bar? My mouth is watering.
But yeah. Serving sizes are such such a scam. It makes me so bad! Who the fuck is going to eat almost all of a delicious butterscotch, flavored candy bar? Everything except the last bite? The last bite is the best part you fuck! I’m sorry for swearing so much. I get very passionate about serving sizes. And butterscotch.
What kind of snickers is this?