130 for 2 hours, I have never had problems with fat not rendering.

by rickastleysanchez

12 Comments

  1. rickastleysanchez

    I know the downvoters will come in mass, and I do not care. Time and time again I have had no problems. I will never join the 137 club, that is too overdone for me.

  2. Dragon_Small_Z

    Because your temp/time is too low to render that fat. Don’t be stubborn and just try 137. 137 in sous vide is nothing like 137 from a bbq or oven.

  3. Zavier13

    2 hours seems way to short, but I also do not have a sousvide machine yet.

  4. sarhoshamiral

    That doesn’t look rendered to me but if you are happy with it go for it.

  5. rickastleysanchez

    I could post a picture of a steak cooked at 140 for 2 hours and you all will still say it is not rendered. I know because I did it.

  6. poutinegalvaude

    2 hours at that temp is too low to render that fat.

  7. senepol

    Why did you cut off the fat and sous vide just that?

  8. BigTimeButNotReally

    Physics has entered the chat…

    … And laughed at you

  9. skovalen

    130F for 2 hrs is not a fat rendering recipe. There is a reason why people argue about ribeyes at 135F vs 137F. Your 130F approach doesn’t even make sense until the cook time gets out to like 12 hrs or more.

Write A Comment