As much as I love sous vide, I don’t think I can go back. Reverse sear just has such a superior texture and taste.

by what_is_a_redditor

24 Comments

  1. mantawolf

    Isnt searing it after a sous-vide still basically a reverse sear?

  2. Jim_in_tn

    I’ve done sous vide and reverse sear, but for a standard thickness steak I think I just prefer a hot charcoal grill.

  3. Top-Elephant-724

    I’d stick with it, too! That thing looks amazing!!

  4. yourtherapisttherapy

    What kind of ribeye is that? Looks like some Aussie wagyu

  5. Ok_Cattle_3018

    Looks like the sear temp was a bit on the low side

  6. Corporate-Scum

    Nothing beats coarse salt and a hot flame. The rest is just foreplay.

  7. DeltaTule

    A lot less plastic in your future diet now. Congrats

  8. Jnizzle510

    I like the texture of the meat so much more with reverse sear opposed to sous vide.

  9. Ecstatic-Engineer-23

    I had some sous vide pork tenderloin and it was amazing, but I imagine veal needs a different care and attention. Sure you could infuse it with rosemary, thyme, sage, in a buttery blend and then fry it on a pan, be it steel, copper, cast iron or non-stick, dry or in oil or butter, or cleared butter at that. But do any of you use a propane torch for the finishing touch? It gives the steak the higher temp flavors of the [maillard ](https://i0.wp.com/www.compoundchem.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Food-Chemistry-Maillard-Reaction.png?ssl=1)effect without having to start a whole batch of charcoal on a grill.

  10. spkoller2

    I think some people haven’t really learned to cook and other people really enjoy technology cooking. Kitchen gadgets are popular

    My parents loved their George Foreman grill and a million people said it was the best, others insist on a press and I met a guy who put steaks in an Instapot. Now men make boil in bag steaks.

    Oxygen and breathing are important parts of cooking

    It’s tough beating a great wood fire, charcoal or hardwood lump grill but a good cook can pan fry a delicious steak. Meats have sugars and other elements that love exposed air. When I was getting divorced my roommate begged for Steak Dianne because I could cook it both well done and tender

  11. johnny_moist

    someone correct me if i’m wrong in thinking maybe i just don’t want to boil any food im eating in plastic?

  12. AtlasReadIt

    Why not a regular sear, as in sear then finish in the oven?

  13. MeasurementDue5407

    I pretty much just sous vide frozen meat, Fresh me mostly when it is a less tender cut that benefits from extra hours in the water.

  14. Background_Panda_187

    I don’t think you need to do either for steaks of this thickness.

  15. enigmaticpeon

    Looks killer. After using nothing but reverse sear for the last several hundred steaks, I was in a rush one night and just used the cast iron. Ribeye maybe 1.25-1.5” thick. I could not believe how great it turned out, and I’ve not gone back in the last ~10 steaks.

    Give this a try team: cast iron medium/high heat. 90 seconds each side. Then 30 seconds each side until it hits about 110 (8 mins total for thick ribeye). It will come up to 135 over the next 10 mins. And the crust is insane. And no grey band. Please just try it yall!

  16. I never got the sous vide hype. I mean, I’m sure sous vide is actually great with food that you steam. But anything where you are looking for caramelization, and that can make or break the dish. I’d rather not.

Write A Comment