The second set of pictures aren’t mine (they’re also cheeseburgers, not hamburgers), just random online pics to show how big the burger is. With how oily fast food is, I find it hard to believe the burger would only be 250.

by hachshin

10 Comments

  1. Old-Tomatillo1161

    Yes, the burger is 250. Mcdonalds hamburger is the same. Not the meal, just the burger

  2. Probably accurate. It’s a small patty. Less than 2oz, 90 cals, bun is 140 calories, condiments 15 or so?

  3. tyrannictoe

    The burger itself is tiny dude. Yes it really feels like it’s worth about 2 chocolate cookies.

  4. runningvicuna

    Surprisingly fast food burgers are reasonable but fries, sodas, and shakes are too much for me. No cheese also lowers it but I’d rather have it.

  5. gr8roshan

    Even if it was 50 cal I would not eat that

  6. BlueLondon1905

    Yes. As a PSA; the calorie counts on menu items at chain restaurants are tightly regulated and very accurate

  7. CreeDorofl

    Typical small fast food cheeseburger is 300 calories. McD’s for example. Includes ketchup etc. BK’s is 290. So no shock kid’s version is 250. burgers in general aren’t bad if you make em thin.

  8. OctoberOmicron

    Just a bit over 20% calories from protein. Listed macros seem to line up pretty well (258) with the listed calories. It could be a lot worse honestly. My personal go to items at BK would be the tender grill or just two or three whopper patties.

  9. SavingsSquare2649

    Yup, tasty too. A BK cheese burger and 6 chilli cheese bites are my go to fast food lunch when I’m out and about working.

Write A Comment