Another learning experience, right? We tried 30 hours at 137º hoping to render a little of the fat, get it more tender than a steak but not super soft/mushy. I scalded it, the put it in the sous vide oven for 30 hours, and iced it for a few minutes before searing. The quick sear turned out very well (we love our infrared side burner) and it was nice and pink inside. It was a bit salty for our taste–I would go easier on the dry brine next time.

Sadly, it was pretty chewy. We have decided to grind the leftovers and my British husband will make a cottage pie tonight. We were pretty excited about the possibilities after reading so much love for Chuck/Charles, but wondering if this was the best use of our time. Maybe just a roast in the slow cooker would suffice?

It's the first disappointing thing we've done sous vide in 15 years. We have been on a hanger steak kick for our beef intake this year, but the price on that just went up to $15+ a lb. so I was looking for another option. Any comments or suggestions or encouragement are very much appreciated.

by ieroll

9 Comments

  1. AutoModerator

    **This is a generic reminder message under every image post**

    Thank you for your picture post to r/souvide. We want to remind everyone of Rule #5. Posts should be accompanied by something to foster discussion. A comment, a question, etc is encouraged.

    If you’ve posted a picture of something you’ve prepared, please explain why in a comment so people can have some sort of conversation. Simply dropping a picture of food in the sub isn’t really fostering any discussion which is what we’re all aiming for.

    Posts that are a picture with no discussion can and will be removed by the mods.

    Thank you!!

    *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/sousvide) if you have any questions or concerns.*

  2. gurgle-burgle

    I’ve tried the sir Charles at a few temperatures and times, and while some were better, I never found it to be worth the effort. It’s a long cook time for meat that is just ok. There are way better things you can do with a chuck roast, don’t waste it on sous vide imo.

  3. 137F is too high for anything other than ribeye. I’d go 131F at the most.

  4. PackNo7208

    Chuck can go up to 155 @ 36 hours and still be good. The higher temp renders more fat, and I prefer it. Try a few different temps and times and see what you like.

  5. Chowdahead

    Wonder if the brine might have been the culprit too?

  6. scottybody55

    Is that a Napoleon? Just got one and excited to try the infrared burner!