Hello!

I’m very much a beginner when it comes to cooking, and yesterday was my first time ever cooking lamb. I followed a recipe, and let the meat cook for 2 hours, but I’m still unsure if it looks cooked through? Is it dangerous to eat it if it’s not cooked through (like the potential risks associated with eating raw chicken for instance?).

Thank you in advance.

by Curious-pinguin9867

10 Comments

  1. That’s more than cooked through. Now you have to decide if you like the texture.

  2. Dreg1981

    Lamb is typically served on the rare side. This is overcooked. You’ll be fine.

  3. pileofdeadninjas

    Definitely, you cooked the fuck out of that lamb

  4. Appropriate-Skill-60

    This is a braise. This is just fine. It wouldn’t be tender if it were undercooked. If it wasn’t very tender, then yes, it was probably undercooked slightly – but not in a “food safety” way just a , “this really isn’t very good” kinda way. Braised lamb should be fork tender.

    Were you cooking a smaller piece of lamb (say, a chop) this would be way, way overcooked.

  5. TurduckenEverest

    Lamb is safe to eat even quite rare. So that’s not an issue. As others have said after a 2 hour braise this lamb is thoroughly cooked. If you’re thrown off by the slightly pink color, don’t be. Color is a very unreliable indicator of doneness for all types of meat. Temperature taken with a probe thermometer is the way to go, but also unnecessary in this case.

  6. CaptWineTeeth

    No, you’re going to die of lambonella poisoning.

  7. Short_Elevator_7024

    Lamb is safe raw, akin to beef as long as you can trust your source

  8. Anxious_Visual_990

    Sheep farmer here.. That lamb looks overcooked to me.