Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J. M., Smith, P. & Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11, e0165797 (2016).
Google Scholar
Perignon, M., Vieux, F., Soler, L.-G., Masset, G. & Darmon, N. Improving diet sustainability through evolution of food choices: review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets. Nutr. Rev. 75, 2–17 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hallström, E., Carlsson-Kanyama, A. & Börjesson, P. Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 91, 1–11 (2015).
Google Scholar
Willett, W. et al. Food in the anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).
Google Scholar
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906908116 (2019).
Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518–522 (2014).
Google Scholar
van Dooren, C. A review of the use of linear programming to optimize diets, nutritiously, economically and environmentally. Front. Nutr. 5, 48 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gazan, R. et al. Mathematical optimization to explore tomorrow’s sustainable diets: a narrative review. Adv. Nutr. 9, 602–616 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wilson, N., Clegharn, C. L., Cobiac, L. J., Mizdrak, A. & Nghiem, N. Achieving healthy and sustainable diets: a review of the results of recent studies using mathematical optimization. Adv. Nutr. 10 (Suppl. 4), S389–S403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Donati, M. et al. Towards a sustainable diet combining economic, environmental and nutritional objectives. Appetite 106, 48–57 (2016).
Google Scholar
Barré, T. et al. Reaching nutritional adequacy does not necessarily increase exposure to food contaminants: evidence from a whole-diet modeling approach. J. Nutr. 146, 2149–2157 (2016).
Google Scholar
Reganold, J. P. & Wachter, J. M. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nat. Plants 2, 15221 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D. & Paoletti, M. G. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 95–124 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tuomisto, H. L., Hodge, I. D., Riordan, P. & Macdonald, D. W. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European research. J. Environ. Manage. 112, 309–320 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lynch, D. Environmental impacts of organic agriculture in temperate regions. CAB Rev. 7, 10 (2012).
Tuck, S. L. et al. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 746–755 (2014).
Google Scholar
Henckel, L., Börger, L., Meiss, H., Gaba, S. & Bretagnolle, V. Organic fields sustain weed metacommunity dynamics in farmland landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150002 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lori, M., Symnaczik, S., Mäder, P., De Deyn, G. & Gattinger, A. Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity—a meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS ONE 12, e0180442 (2017).
Google Scholar
de Gavelle, E., Huneau, J.-F., Bianchi, C., Verger, E. & Mariotti, F. Protein adequacy is primarily a matter of protein quantity, not quality: modeling an increase in plant:animal protein ratio in French adults. Nutrients 9, 1333 (2017).
Google Scholar
Andreeva, V. A. et al. Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 69, 893–898 (2015).
Google Scholar
Muller, A. et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 8, 1290 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barré, T. et al. Integrating nutrient bioavailability and co-production links when identifying sustainable diets: how low should we reduce meat consumption? PLoS ONE 13, e0191767 (2018).
Google Scholar
Seconda, L. et al. Association between sustainable dietary patterns and body weight, overweight, and obesity risk in the NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz259 (2019).
Soret, S. et al. Climate change mitigation and health effects of varied dietary patterns in real-life settings throughout North America. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 100, 490S–495S (2014).
Google Scholar
Cobiac, L. J. & Scarborough, P. Modelling the health co-benefits of sustainable diets in the UK, France, Finland, Italy and Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 624–633 (2019).
Google Scholar
Milner, J. et al. Health effects of adopting low greenhouse gas emission diets in the UK. BMJ Open 5, e007364 (2015).
Google Scholar
Platel, K. & Srinivasan, K. Bioavailability of micronutrients from plant foods: an update. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56, 1608–1619 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nair, K. M. & Augustine, L. F. Food synergies for improving bioavailability of micronutrients from plant foods. Food Chem. 238, 180–185 (2018).
Google Scholar
Andreeva, V. A. et al. Comparison of dietary intakes between a large online cohort study (Etude NutriNet-Santé) and a nationally representative cross-sectional study (Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé) in France: addressing the issue of generalizability in e-epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 184, 660–669 (2016).
Google Scholar
Clune, S., Crossi, E. & Verghese, K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 766–783 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kramer, G. F., Tyszler, M., van’t Veer, P. & Blonk, H. Decreasing the overall environmental impact of the Dutch diet: how to find healthy and sustainable diets with limited changes. Public Health Nutr. 20, 1699–1709 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gehring, J. et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods by pesco-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans: associations with duration and age at diet initiation. J. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa196 (2020).
Kesse-Guyot, E., Castetbon, K., Touvier, M., Hercberg, S. & Galan, P. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire designed for French adults. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 57, 153–162 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hercberg, S. et al. The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 242 (2010).
Google Scholar
Baudry, J. et al. Contribution of organic food to the diet in a large sample of French adults (the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study). Nutrients 7, 8615–8632 (2015).
Google Scholar
Étude Nutrinet-Santé. Table de Composition des Aliments de l’étude Nutrinet-Santé (Economica, 2013).
Gomiero, T. Food quality assessment in organic vs. conventional agricultural produce: findings and issues. Appl. Soil Ecol. 123, 714–728 (2018).
Google Scholar
Verger, E. O., Mariotti, F., Holmes, B. A., Paineau, D. & Huneau, J.-F. Evaluation of a diet quality index based on the probability of adequate nutrient intake (PANDiet) using national French and US dietary surveys. PLoS ONE 7, e42155 (2012).
Google Scholar
Martinez-Gonzalez, M. A. et al. A provegetarian food pattern and reduction in total mortality in the Prevencion con Dieta Mediterranea (PREDIMED) study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 100, 320S–328S (2014).
Google Scholar
Colombet, Z. et al. Individual characteristics associated with changes in the contribution of plant foods to dietary intake in a French prospective cohort. Eur. J. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1752-8 (2018).
Lacour, C. et al. Environmental impacts of plant-based diets: how does organic food consumption contribute to environmental sustainability? Front. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00008 (2018).
Consumer Panels—Kantar Worldpanel Purchase Database (Kantar, 2012).
Seconda, L. et al. Assessment of the sustainability of the Mediterranean diet combined with organic food consumption: an individual behaviour approach. Nutrients 9, 61 (2017).
Google Scholar
Seconda, L. et al. Comparing nutritional, economic, and environmental performances of diets according to their levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2195-1 (2018).
ISO 14040:2006. Management Environnemental—Analyse du Cycle de Vie (ISO, 2006); https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/fr/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/03/74/37456.html
Audsley, E. et al. Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture: Final Report Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028 (European Commission & Directorate-General for Agriculture, 2003).
Cowell, S. J. & Clift, R. Impact assessment for LCAs involving agricultural production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2, 99–103 (1997).
Google Scholar
Nemecek, T. & Kägi, T. Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems Version 2 (Ecoinvent, 2007).
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Provisions and Action Steps (EU Science Hub, European Commission, 2010); https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/international-reference-life-cycle-data-system-ilcd-handbook-general-guide-life-cycle
Pointereau, P. et al. DIALECTE, a comprehensive and quick tool to assess the agro-environmental performance of farms. In 10th European IFSA Symposium (IFSA, 2012).
Colomb, V. et al. (eds) in AGRIBALYSE: The French Public LCI Database for Agricultural Products: High Quality Data for Producers and Environmental Labelling D104 (EDP, 2015).
Koch, P. et al. Methodological guidelines for LCA of French agricultural products. In Life Cycle Management Conference (LCM2011) https://agritrop.cirad.fr/561176/ (Agritop, 2011).
ILCD Handbook—General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed Guidance (EU Science Hub, European Commission, 2010).
van Dooren, C., Aiking, H. & Vellinga, P. In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 1297–1314 (2018).
Google Scholar
Goedkoop, M. et al. ReCiPe 2008: A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level. Report 1: Characterization. (Ruimte en Milieu, 2013).
Vanham, D. et al. Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs. Sci. Total Environ. 693, 133642 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vergnaud, A.-C. et al. Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study. Int. J. Public Health 56, 407–417 (2011).
Google Scholar
Touvier, M. et al. Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 25, 287–296 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hagströmer, M., Oja, P. & Sjöström, M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 9, 755–762 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mausser, H. Fields-MITACS Industrial Problems Workshop: Normalization and Other Topics in Multi-Objective Optimization (2006).
Schofield, W. N. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 39(Suppl. 1), 5–41 (1985).
Google Scholar